Dutch GAAP vs IFRS – the key differences you need to know

For organisations operating across borders, understanding accounting standards isn’t simply a compliance exercise – it is at the heart of building transparency, consistency, and trust with stakeholders. In the Netherlands, companies often face an important choice: applying Dutch GAAP (often referred to as NL GAAP) or using IFRS.

But what exactly are the main differences between Dutch GAAP and IFRS? And more importantly: how do these differences affect financial reporting in practice?

What is Dutch GAAP?

Dutch GAAP (NL GAAP) refers to the accounting principles defined by the Dutch Accounting Standards Board (DASB). These are based on EU directives but contain national adaptations to suit the Dutch business environment.

Some key features include:

• Principle-based standards: Dutch GAAP is aligned with EU directives but often provides more options and flexibility than IFRS.
• Common for non-listed companies: Smaller and medium-sized entities in the Netherlands typically prepare their accounts under Dutch GAAP.
• Simplified disclosures: Reporting requirements are less extensive than under IFRS, reducing administrative burden.

IFRS in the Dutch context

IFRS is mandatory for consolidated financial statements of listed companies in the EU, including those on Euronext Amsterdam. However, non-listed Dutch companies may opt for IFRS voluntarily, often when:

• They have significant international shareholders.
• They operate cross-border or seek financing abroad.
• Transparency and comparability with international peers are a priority.

Key differences between Dutch GAAP vs IFRS

Here are some of the most significant areas where the frameworks differ:

1. Measurement and valuation
   • Dutch GAAP: Emphasises historical cost but allows fair value in certain cases (for example, investment property).
   • IFRS: Makes broader use of fair value, especially for financial instruments.
2. Goodwill and intangibles
   • Dutch GAAP: Goodwill is amortised over its useful life (max. 10 years if indefinite).
   • IFRS: Goodwill is not amortised but subject to annual impairment testing.
3. Revenue recognition
   • Dutch GAAP: More prescriptive rules; less reliance on a single overarching principle.
   • IFRS: Uses a unified five-step revenue recognition model (IFRS 15).
4. Deferred tax
   • Dutch GAAP: Recognition of deferred tax is less comprehensive and may allow exemptions.
   • IFRS: Requires recognition for all temporary differences, with some limited exceptions.
5. Consolidation
   • Dutch GAAP: Small and medium-sized groups can benefit from exemptions.
   • IFRS: Focuses on the control principle with fewer exemptions.

Practical reporting implications

For CFOs and auditors, the choice between Dutch GAAP and IFRS isn’t only technical — it is strategic.

• Dutch GAAP is more straightforward, reduces reporting complexity, and is often preferred when operations and stakeholders are primarily domestic.
• IFRS is more resource-intensive, but improves international comparability, facilitates cross-border financing, and supports growth strategies targeting global investors.

How CtrlPrint can support

The decision between Dutch GAAP and IFRS comes with practical consequences: from the way you present performance, to how investors assess risk, to how future M&A activity plays out.

At CtrlPrint, we help organisations manage this complexity by:

• Creating streamlined reporting processes aligned to your chosen standards.
• Supporting clear and consistent communication to stakeholders.
• Providing collaborative tools that improve accuracy and efficiency across reporting teams.

With deep experience at the intersection of design, compliance, and communication, CtrlPrint positions your reporting to meet expectations — whether under Dutch GAAP, IFRS or both.

Request a demo of CtrlPrint