Navigating double materiality: a global shift in North American reporting

For North American reporting leaders, the regulatory landscape has traditionally been defined by a clear focus: financial materiality. This standard asks: if a risk doesn't threaten the bottom line, is it material?

With the advent of the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), the rules of engagement are changing. US and Canadian companies with a significant footprint in the EU are now facing a comprehensive new standard. At the heart of this shift lies double materiality, a concept that requires a holistic view of the company's place in the world. This approach is increasingly familiar to large firms seeking alignment with global best practices like GRI.

The dual perspective: impact meets finance

Under the familiar single materiality lens (favoured by the ISSB and SEC), a company asks: how do sustainability issues, like climate change, impact our balance sheet?

Double materiality demands a second, equally important question: how does our company impact the world?

This "inside-out" perspective covers everything from environmental pollution to human rights across the supply chain. Under ESRS, a matter is material if it meets the criteria for either impact materiality or financial materiality. You cannot disregard a significant environmental impact simply because it doesn’t yet affect your profits.

The data challenge: breaking down silos

The practical implication of double materiality is a massive expansion of the data required for reporting. You are no longer just asking Finance for numbers; you are gathering deep, granular data from sustainability teams, HR, supply chain managers, and external consultants.

In a traditional workflow, this leads to chaos. The Sustainability Director works in a Google Doc, the CFO works in Excel, and the Legal Counsel marks up a PDF. Trying to merge these distinct “versions of the truth” is a recipe for errors and delay.

CtrlPrint transforms this fragmented process. Instead of working in silos, CtrlPrint connects your CFO, your Sustainability Director, and the rest of your teams into one seamless environment. Content teams start working directly in InDesign, Word, and Excel, connected through the platform. This connectivity is vital for double materiality assessments. It allows the “Impact” team to update a carbon figure in the sustainability section while the “Finance” team works on the risks section, ensuring that while their timelines may differ, their data repository remains unified.

Rigour and review: the new compliance standard

With the stakes raised, the “soft” data of sustainability is becoming as hard – and legally liable – as financial data. You need a complete audit trail of who said what, and when.

CtrlPrint’s secure cloud platform ensures version control and role-based access. This allows you to give specific permissions to different contributors. For example, you can allow your external sustainability consultants to draft the “Impact” chapter while restricting them from editing the “Financial Results”.

Furthermore, for companies that fall under the specific digital tagging mandates of the EU, the CtrlPrint XBRL Tagger enables companies to meet regulatory requirements such as ESEF/ESRS directly within the interface. This means compliance isn’t an afterthought; it is built into the report from the ground up.

Conclusion

The arrival of double materiality signals a shift towards more transparent, holistic corporate reporting. By centralising your data, streamlining collaboration, and integrating compliance directly into your workflow, you can ensure your reports are not just compliant, but compelling.

Request a demo of CtrlPrint here.